This consolidated report summarizes findings from piloting activities conducted across Estonia, Croatia, and the Netherlands.
It integrates:
The goal is to assess:
Across all three contexts, visual thinking methodologies demonstrated consistent positive outcomes in:
✔ Learner engagement
✔ Communication confidence
✔ Emotional awareness
✔ Structured problem-solving
✔ Participation of quieter learners
✔ Inclusion of low-literacy participants
While implementation styles differed slightly by country, core patterns were consistent:
Across all three contexts, visual thinking methodologies demonstrated consistent positive outcomes in:
✔ Learner engagement
✔ Communication confidence
✔ Emotional awareness
✔ Structured problem-solving
✔ Participation of quieter learners
✔ Inclusion of low-literacy participants
While implementation styles differed slightly by country, core patterns were consistent:
The methodology was presented and demonstrated to more than 30 additional adult educators through multiplier events, workshops, and dissemination sessions.
Many educators highlighted that:
Several educators expressed intent to pilot selected tools within their own institutions.
Based on piloting and feedback, the following adjustments were implemented:
Across countries, learners reported:
Particularly strong feedback included:
1. Visual Thinking Supports Inclusion
Visual methodologies proved particularly powerful for:
Migrants
Adults with low literacy
Long-term unemployed individuals
Learners with low self-esteem
Participants with previous negative school experiences
2. Structure Increases Psychological Safety
Consistent session structure (intro → visual mapping → scenario → reflection) increased predictability and safety.
3. Adaptability Is a Core Transversal Skill
Across all countries, adaptability emerged as a central need — especially in labour market transitions and multicultural environments.
4. Blended Delivery Requires Flexibility
While digital tools were effective, printable and offline formats remain essential for equitable access.
Based on consolidated feedback:
The partnership recommends:
Ovaj projekt je financiran iz programa Erasmus+ Europske unije.
Podrška Europske komisije za izradu ove publikacije ne predstavlja odobrenje sadržaja, koji odražava isključivo stajališta autora, te Komisija ne može biti odgovorna za bilo kakvu upotrebu informacija koje se u njemu nalaze.
Financirano od strane Europske unije. Izneseni stavovi i mišljenja su, međutim, isključivo stavovi autora/autorica i ne odražavaju nužno stavove Europske unije ili Izvršne agencije za obrazovanje i kulturu (EACEA). Ni Europska unija ni EACEA ne mogu se smatrati odgovornima za njih.